Showing posts with label Nth America (-US). Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nth America (-US). Show all posts

Censorship or Backdown?

[update 2: The Age have reinstated the article ... no explanations]

My previous post about the "Forest Fire Jihad" warning needs an update. The Age has removed the article from its site. WHY? Because of all the publicity it has received in the last 24 hours, or because it was asked by the Government, and an embarrassed Attorney-General, Robert McClelland?

[update 1: It is possible that The Age just decided to cash in by charging $2.20 access for everyone who wanted to read it, however no other Australian news sources are reporting what the rest of the world have regurgitated in the last 24 hours. Why so silent?

A Daily Mail report (UK) states: Police say they have seen no indication that the Victorian blazes were a 'forest jihad', launched by a group of Islamic extremists using fire as a form of terror against Western communities - despite South Australian Premier Mike Rann labelling the perpetrators as 'terrorists'.]

Fortunately there are other sources and I link them below as well as copy the article for posterity.

Islam group urges forest fire jihad
by Josh Gordon for The Age
September 7, 2008

AUSTRALIA has been singled out as a target for "forest jihad" by a group of Islamic extremists urging Muslims to deliberately light bushfires as a weapon of terror.

US intelligence channels earlier this year identified a website calling on Muslims in Australia, the US, Europe and Russia to "start forest fires", claiming "scholars have justified chopping down and burning the infidels' forests when they do the same to our lands".

The website, posted by a group called the Al-Ikhlas Islamic Network, argues in Arabic that lighting fires is an effective form of terrorism justified in Islamic law under the "eye for an eye" doctrine.

The posting — which instructs jihadis to remember "forest jihad" in summer months — says fires cause economic damage and pollution, tie up security agencies and can take months to extinguish so that "this terror will haunt them for an extended period of time".

"Imagine if, after all the losses caused by such an event, a jihadist organisation were to claim responsibility for the forest fires," the website says. "You can hardly begin to imagine the level of fear that would take hold of people in the United States, in Europe, in Russia and in Australia."

With the nation heading into another hot, dry summer, Australian intelligence agencies are treating the possibility that bushfires could be used as a weapon of terrorism as a serious concern.

Attorney-General Robert McClelland said the Federal Government remained "vigilant against such threats", warning that anyone caught lighting a fire as a weapon of terror would feel the wrath of anti-terror laws.

"Any information that suggests a threat to Australia's interests is investigated by relevant agencies as appropriate," Mr McClelland said.

Adam Dolnik, director of research at the University of Wollongong's Centre for Transnational Crime Prevention, said that bushfires (unlike suicide bombing) were generally not considered a glorious type of attack by jihadis, in keeping with a recent decline in the sophistication of terrorist operations.

"With attacks like bushfires, yes, it would be easy. It would be very damaging and we do see a decreasing sophistication as a part of terrorist attacks," Dr Dolnik said.

"In recent years, there have been quite a few attacks averted and it has become more and more difficult for groups to do something effective."

Dr Dolnik said he had observed an increase in traffic on jihadi websites calling for a simplification of terrorist attacks because the more complex operations had been failing. But starting bushfires was still often regarded as less effective than other operations because governments could easily deny terrorism as the cause.

The internet posting by the little-known group claimed the idea of forest fires had been attributed to imprisoned Al Qaeda leader Abu Musab Al-Suri. It said Al-Suri had urged terrorists to use sulphuric acid and petrol to start forest fires.

Check out all the links through Google here.

Other Sources:
Jihad Watch
Western Institute for Study of the Environment News
Clipmarks
Canada Free Press
Hillary's Village

Difference Between the Obama and McCain Tax Plans

North American Patriot: The Real True Honest Fair and Balanced Difference Between the Obama and McCain Tax Plans

Its not so much the difference in tax policy that is astounding ... its the fact that they actually include people who earn more than $2,870,000 per annum.

Who actually earns that kind of money and doesn't have a full time tax accountant to reduce their liability to zero through dodgy tax minimisation and avoidance schemes??

LOL

Picking a Pope

Much has been said about the accuracy of polls versus bookies when it has come to recent elections. The odds seem to be in favour of the pundits over the pollsters, but can we say the same for the one election that currently has the world on its toes.

The major difference between the papal ballot and a democratic government election is quite clearly the voters themselves.


115 "princes of the church" will meet tomorrow behind closed doors and away from the influence of the mortal world. They will choose, through a series of secret ballots, the man who will lead the Catholic Church and its 1 billion followers.


This is not democracy, nor is it representative. The next Pope must be an unmarried, single, male, Catholic. Even though the voting Cardinals can choose from the entire world they are likely to choose from amongst those in the conclave; and only those Cardinals under the age of 80 are entitled to be a part of that process.


Of course, this process is still much more democratic than the current process for electing our Prime Minister or Governor-General :-)


So who will be the new Pontiff?


If you listen to the people (via the bookies) the top candidates are:


NAME . . . . . . . . . . . . PADDYPOWER / SPORTINGBET



Joseph Ratzinger (Germany) 3 / 5.5

Jean-Marie Lustiger (France) 4.5 / 6

Carlo Maria Martini (Italy) 5 / 6.5

Dionigi Tettamanzi (Italy) 7 / 9

Claudio Hummes (Brazil) 8 / 8

Francis Arinze (Nigeria) 8 /10

Jorge Bergoglio (Argentina) 12 /10

Oscar Maradiaga (Honduras) 16 / 9

Angelo Sodano (Italy) 10 / 17

Jose Da Cruz Policarpo (Portugal) 12 / 15

Francisco Ossa (Chile) 14 / 17

Keith OBrien (Scotland) 20 / 21

Cardianl Ruini (Italy) 20 / 26

Christoph von Schoenborn (Austria) 33 / 15

Cardinal Scola (Italy) 33 / 17

Ivan Dias (India) 33 / 21

Giovanni Battista Re (Italy) 33 / 21

Cardinal Hoyos (Colombia) 40 / 17

Giacomo Biffi (Italy) 40 / 17

Jaime Alamino (Cuba) 40 / 17

Norberto Carrera (Mexico) 40 / 26

Ennio Antonelli (Italy) 50 / 17

Juan Cipriani (Italy) 50 / 17

Crescenzio Sepe (Italy) 80 / 17

...

George Pell (Australia) 66 / 101


The distribution of Catholics would suggest that the pontiff must come from Europe or Latin/South America. Therefore I will eliminate the popular Arinze from Nigeria (In addition I don't think the church is ready for a black Pope.) as well as Dias from India.

I'm inclined to eliminate all the Italians as the Church would appear to need to continue reaching out beyond its tradional homeland.

History shows us that the favourites are usually not the winners, so I'll eliminate Ratzinger and Lustiger. Similarly, I will deduct O'Brien as he originates from a superpower country - another unfavourable factor.

This leaves two Europeans (Policarpo and von Schoenborn) with seven from South America. But I think we can safely remove Alamino and Hoyos because politically, Cuba and Colombia fail to live up to the mark of delivering a Pope.

Thus, my shortlist is:


Claudio Hummes (Brazil)

Jorge Mario Bergoglio (Argentina)

Oscar Rodriguez Maradiaga (Honduras)

Jose Da Cruz Policarpo (Portugal)

Francisco Javier Errazuriz Ossa (Chile)

Christoph von Schoenborn (Austria)

Norberto Rivera Carrera (Mexico)


It is possible to strike off Bergoglio because he is a Jesuit. Also, Hummes and Maradiaga are both considered progressives, which may go against them in a strikingly conservative conclave. Ossa and Carrera are strong contenders but who will the European Princes of the Church prefer?

Von Schoenborn would be a decisive vote for Europe, however he is reported to have made a few judgemental errors that have left him merely working in the shadow of retired Austrian Cardinal Franz König.

Policarpo, from Portugal, may be able to garner the much needed support of both Europe AND Latin America to ensure the papacy as a bridge between traditional Europe, which is home to 50% of all Cardinals and 25% of all Catholics, and Latin America, which commands 43% of the world's Catholic population but only 18% of Cardinals.

My money is on Policarpo or Ossa, with Carrera an outside third.


Good source of info at the New York Times

Birthday blues and Christmas hope


Today I have reached 35 years of age.



Normally it is a time for celebration, but this year I am making it a time for reflection. Not just because I'm despondent at the return of Dubbya to the Whitehouse, following Howard's undeserved election bonanza. Rather I am reflecting upon the fortunes of my life, given the quirk of nature that saw me born in one place and not another.



Today I have the dubious privilege of exceeding the average life expectancy of 1.5 million people in Botswana by 5 years, and I've equalled the life expectancy for 10.5 million people in Zambia. see Index Mundi




Instead of Africa, I was lucky enough to be born into an anglo-saxon Australian family, giving me a good chance to reach 80 years of age. I'm almost at the halfway mark. Only ten countries in the world manage to have such a long life expectancy for their citizens.



  1. Andorra (83.5)

  2. Macau (82.03)

  3. San Marino (81.53)

  4. Singapore (81.53)

  5. Hong Kong (81.39)

  6. Japan (81.04)

  7. Switzerland (80.31)

  8. Sweden (80.3)

  9. Australia (80.26)

  10. Iceland (80.18)



Canada falls just behind in 11th place with 79.96 years.



Australia might be better ranked if it were not for the shameful health of our indigenous people, whose life expectancy is at least 20 years less than non-indigenous Australians.



It means that our indigenous people have a life expectancy only slightly better than the people of Cambodia and Sudan (58 years) but worse than that of Bangladesh (61 years) and India (64 years).



So much is wrong with our own nation.

So much is wrong with the world.



I'll be waiting a very long time to have my birthday wish fulfilled (I can't tell you, as that supposedly renders it invalid) ... but I live in hope. Enormous hope, backed by perserverence and a willingness to be a conscientious objector against the misguided selfishness of our modern world.



Part of this hope has been revived by the plan for Sir Bob Geldof and Midge Ure to re-record the Band Aid hit, "Do They Know it's Christmas Time" using a swag of contemporary artists. Although it is expected to be an instant chart topper and raise millions of dollars for Ethiopia and Sudan, it is still a small drop in the ocean and is literally just a "band-aid" to a gaping wound on human existence. Poverty and related health issues can only be solved by the combined will of the international community through their governments.



But good luck and congratulations to Geldof and his team for putting this issue back in the spotlight.






[+/-] show/hide this post


World Wants Kerry to Beat Bush!


Well, that was the headline from the Sydney Morning Herald, but I'd hardly call 10 countries being definitive of the world. Then again, the USA thinks the world consists of itself and a handful of annoying little countries.



Similar (they say identical and then contradict themselves) polling was conducted among 10 nations in mid-late September to gauge public opinion toward the upcoming USA election.



Regarding the opinion toward the USA, only Israel went against the trend of negativity with 40% of respondents having an improved attitude towards the USA compared to 28% who had a worse opinion. Other results were Canada, 64% had a worse attitude compared with 70% of the French, 45% of Brits, Japan 74%, South Korea 67% and Australia 54%. The SMH failed to report the result from Russia, Spain and Mexico.



Other results from the survey indicated strong support for Kerry; that the USA had too much influence on international affairs; and a consistent opposition to the War in Iraq.



The full report is copied below.




World wants Kerry to beat Bush

By Michael Millett, October 15, 2004 - 9:35AM


The US President, George Bush, is encountering growing international hostility to his campaign for a second term in the White House.



A remarkable collaborative polling exercise, undertaken by leading newspapers in 10 countries across the globe, has highlighted strong opposition to the Bush re-election campaign.



While the findings have no direct impact on the US election - the poll excludes the Americans whose vote really counts - they show the Bush Administration is struggling to secure popular support for its policies outside American borders.



The hostility is directed not only at the White House: the image of the US itself appears to have suffered collateral damage. This is despite the fact that most of those polled believe in the US alliance and declare they are not anti-American.



The ambitious exercise, initiated by Canada's Quebec-based La Presse, required the 10 project partners to run identical polls in mid- to late September to gauge public attitudes towards the US election on November 2.



The Herald, which commissioned its regular pollster ACNielsen for the exercise, is the first paper to appear with the results in print under Friday's co-ordinated publication date.



Across most of the countries surveyed, including Australia, opinions towards the US had deteriorated over the first Bush term.



Only Israel, lockstep with the US in terms of foreign policy objectives and delivery, ran against the trend. Forty per cent of Israelis surveyed said their attitude towards the US had improved over the past two or three years. Twenty-six per cent said their view had soured.



This contrasts with the response elsewhere. In Canada, 64 per cent said their attitude had worsened, France 70 per cent, Britain 45 per cent, Japan 74 per cent, South Korea 67 per cent and Australia 54 per cent.



The souring view is directly linked to public dissatisfaction with Mr Bush, mainly over his prosecution of the Iraq war.



In all countries except for Israel, majority opinion remains firmly against the US-led war. (No specific question on Iraq was asked in the Australian exercise.) In July, a majority of Australians (55 per cent) said the war was not justified, down eight points since May.



The strongest opposition to the war was in South Korea, Mexico, Spain and France.



This anti-war mood appears to feed directly into an international preference for John Kerry, the Democrat challenging Mr Bush for the presidency.



In eight of the 10 countries taking part in the poll, Senator Kerry is rated the preferred winner, with huge margins in France, Canada and Spain. Only in Russia (52-48) and Israel (a more decisive 50-24) is Mr Bush the preferred winner.



Senator Kerry benefits from being a relative unknown. In Australia, respondents were less likely to express an opinion about him (a 37 per cent "don't know" response compared to only 4 per cent for Mr Bush) but there were more people with a favourable rather than unfavourable opinion of him.



If Mr Bush was re-elected, 40 per cent of Australians surveyed believed the international state of affairs would worsen. Eleven per cent believed it would improve and 45 per cent believed it would stay the same.



While the appeal of the US has faded of late, Australians remain strongly committed to the relationship. Seventy-two per cent had a favourable opinion of Americans; 22 per cent had the opposite view.



Almost three in every four believed it was important that the US play a leadership role in the world and 92 per cent said it was important Australia maintain good relations with the US.



Four of the project countries asked whether the US had too much influence on international affairs. The results were emphatic: 86 per cent of Canadians, 73 per cent of Britons, 66 per cent of Mexicans and 87 per cent of South Koreans answered yes.







[+/-] show/hide this post

Righto! All you blithering US Republicans ... Listen up!

This follows on from my earlier post More anti-democracy in USA



Jimmy Carter fears for fair Florida vote


By North America correspondent John Shovelan


Former US President Jimmy
Carter
says conditions for a fair election still do not exist in the
state of Florida.


In an article in the Washington Post, Mr Carter wrote Florida's electoral
officials have proven to be highly partisan.


He says Florida's Republican governor Jeb
Bush, a strong supporter of his brother George W Bush, has taken no steps
to correct this and "some basic international requirements for a fair
election are missing".


He says it was obvious that in the election in 2000 that basic standards
were not met and the disturbing fact is that a repetition of the problems
seems likely.


The 2000 vote was ultimately decided by the US Supreme Court, which stopped
the recount of contested ballots.


Mr Carter founded the Carter
Centre
in 1982, which monitors elections worldwide.



Source: ABC News

Is that good enough for you guys?


Or does Carter lack credibility because he is a "dummycrat"?



Canada to honour draft dodgers

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,132971,00.html

There's only a couple of things that the USA dislike more than having their world authority challenged.

The first is Canada ... and the second is draft dodgers.

The plan to hold a festival and build a monument to the many young men that fled to Canada to avoid being conscripted into the Vietnam war is raising the ire of Uncle Sam!

Can we expect another migration next year if Bush wins the election and has to draft thousands of citizens to go to fight in the war against Terror. I still can't find Terror on my maps! :-)